Boris

Of course not. Just as an unusually cold spell doesn't prove Global Cooling. Scientists know this. I know this. Most of the people that are actually interested in climate science and visit this forum know this. The Clown does not. See: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20200...

From the site referenced in his ‘question’: “While global warming activists are rubbing their hands together in anticipation and glee hoping this will aid their case…“ - That’s pretty much all you need to know about that site.

Of course, actual climate scientists, that actually understand science, know that climate and weather are not the same thing. More heat in the atmosphere = more energy = more extreme weather events, hot and cold, wet and dry.

Is there a simple way to explain this to the Clown so that he finally gets it and stops embarrassing himself? Poor little fella.

I’ve only been aware of Yahoo Answers for about a month, and the only posts I have made that might upset someone have been on the Clown's stupid ‘questions’. He of course immediately blocked me because his balls are so small, and coincidentally I find I’m unable to reply to almost all of the stupid leading anonymous questions in this group. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that it must be the Clown that is posting most of the stupid anonymous leading questions.

If he had any idea how science, statistics or even logic works, he would have been able to figure that out and not embarrass himself.

My estimate is that somewhere between 50% and 70% of the stupid anonymous anti-science posts in this group come from him.

Anyone who would like to join me in this research, just crate an account he doesn't recognise then post some truth under one of his inane questions, then when you’re blocked, see how many of the idiotic anonymous leading questions you also find yourself blocked from.

Once we get enough data, Yahoo will be forced to act, and we can get back to discussing climate science.

Hey Clown, ‘data’ isn’t a synonym for ‘look what I pulled from my bottom mummy’. Just continue as you are, and you’re abuse of this forum will be revealed.

Here comes the anonymous drivel ...

Seems random to me.

Since I’m unable to choose which forum to post in, and it seems to be automatically sorted by title…

Scientist love to hear from deniers. In fact, it’s one of the basic principles of science.

EG: I assert this, prove me wrong.

99% of science is the ‘prove me wrong’ part. It's the most basic principle of science.

If you don’t understand that, you have missed a crucial part of your education.

Now let’s hear from the anonymous trolls, who ‘believe’ but have no proof.

LIGO measures length change by comparing how long it takes for a LASER to bounce up and down two legs. But it’s not just space that’s squeezing, it’s space-time. Any variation in length is accompanied by an exactly equivalent variation in time. If the leg gets shorter, the beam travels slower and takes the exact same amount of time to cover the distance. It should read zero even in the presence of large gravity waves. What am I missing?

LIGO measures length change by comparing how long it takes for a LASER to bounce up and down two legs. But it’s not just space that’s squeezing, it’s space-time. Any variation in length is accompanied by an exactly equivalent variation in the time. If the leg gets shorter, the beam travels slower and takes the exact same amount of time to cover the distance. It should read zero even in the presence of large gravity waves. What am I missing?