hiroshima and nagasaki were more sad than 9.11 end of story?

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were also “military attacks”, but in a war Japan started. That is the fact you idiots keep ignoring. 

In some ways yes

but

not in all ways.

One important difference

is that we were at war with Japan.

The use of the atomic bomb was not a terrorist act.

It was an act intended to force quick surrender

and indeed

the US warned Japan what was going to happen if they did not surrender

and they did not

and so it happened.

(It's interesting: after the first bomb, the Emperor wanted to surrender but his generals advised him that the U.S. could not possibly have another such bomb and that Japan should not surrender. Again: after the first bomb, the U.S. warned Japan that they would drop another such bomb if Japan did not surrender unconditionally, which was the reason for the delay - three days - between the bombings. We intentionally gave Japan time to surrender. After the second bomb the Emperor ignored his generals and surrendered.)

Also: the cities bombed were two of the biggest producers of military hardware in Japan.

That is: they were "manufacturing cities".

That doesn't justify the deaths of civilians, of course

but clearly

there is a difference between an overt act of killing

preceded by a warning

against a military target (that includes civilians, I make no excuses)

intended to force a surrender and end to war

compared to a secret act

against a strictly-civilian target

with no such "moral goal" as an end to war intended.

hiroshima and nagasaki was a spiteful ACT by America

Japan was about to surrender

America dropped hiroshima and nagasaki atomic bombs:

-for test purposes on HUMANS

-to prevent Russia from entering the pacific war and scoring victories

americans should understand how to research FACTS