Is it hypocritical that this global warming denier attacks peer review in one question, while touting it in another?

Yes I suppose it is, Peer review is still accepted as a standard, but more and more people are beginning to believe it has problems in the modern age, the number of scientific papers written these days has grown astronomically, but peer review has not kept up.

I think the peer review system need reviewing.

I believe that it is commonly called "cherry picking", Pegminer. Discard all evidence, unless it supports the thinking of the person. They would never stoop so low as to allow contrary evidence to stand in the way of their ideology. When it comes to those that deny the evidence presented before them that the AGWT is the best scientific theory to explain the observations being made concerning our changing climate, not just a changed climate, then I only say one thing to say to them. There truly is no substitute for a self induced ignorance.

Generalize much?

Here it is in a nut-shell.

Carbon Dioxide DOES NOT have a greenhouse effect strong enough to account for median global temperature increases. The saturation level to accomplish the increases in temperature would have to be 1,000 times higher. Not just doubled.

So, increased Carbon Dioxide levels are not the culprit for the earth heating. Which means that the climate change that the earth is experiencing is NOT man made. It has to be something else.

Is that clear enough for you? I don't think you can call me a hypocrite at this point since I've made my point perfectly clear and without any confusing statements.

expecting consistency from deniers is too much to ask

of course it is. sad that most do not realize it.