Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
8 Answers
- SpartanCanuckLv 78 years agoFavorite Answer
Or, alternately, if a law enforcement agency were to purchase such targets, it could be for exercises which require an officer to distinguish threats from bystanders...
Source(s): Not psychotic. - Who Dat ?Lv 78 years ago
probably not (in the daytime anyway) because hunters are usually expected to be armed.
Most of those training targets are people you wouldn't normally expect to be pointing a gun at you.
Of course the 2 pictures of a grey bearded Joe Biden or Dick Cheney with a shotgun are an exception but all vice presidents look pretty much alike & nobody cares about them anyway so I guess the point of the DHS training is to pretty much shoot anything that moves.
- ?Lv 78 years ago
If I were a state game warden, I would take it as an insult for any outside agency to horn in on my job that I think I do well without help.
BTW there are such people as federal game wardens.
- f100_supersabreLv 78 years ago
Why not?
According to Napolitano, EVERY citizen with a gun is dangerous; and veterans are more so.
ALSO, with the NDAA being in effect, they don't NEED any "probable cause" anymore.
- 8 years ago
BBean: Actually there are. They are called Federal Wildlife Officers.
Source(s): http://www.fwoa.org/