don't you think each religion holds a piece to the puzzle?

they all have wisdom, but jumping to conclusions because you're afraid of something isn't wise

I disagree that all and sundry variations are in basic terms splendor and linguistic. What you're suggesting is an previous refrain, that all and sundry religions are relatively the comparable on the middle. it relatively is barely on the threshold of being authentic on the moral point. the priority isn't that a given faith does not have a sparkling theory of God: the "concern" (despite if it is one) is they do have sparkling suggestions, yet they disagree with one yet another. If I say there is one God, loving, sensible, and transcendent, and this God is the main suitable certainty of the Universe and made the Universe, and somebody else says the Universe got here approximately clearly yet there are various thousand exalted human-like creature that they are calling gods, how can there be any settlement on theory of God? particular, they'd artwork mutually to make existence greater suitable ... yet settlement does not make any sense.

A puzzle that orders you to throw out all the other pieces the moment you pick one of them isn't much of a puzzle.

The imaginary puzzle? Sure.

It's like a shlt sundae. I wouldn't exactly say a bunch of shlt sundaes each have a piece of the key to tastiness.

But Jesus is the truth!!! If you want to see the whole picture, then the best way to do that is by following Jesus!!! You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free!!!

No, not if you think the puzzle is "god" or "absolute truth".

~Agnostic atheist; ex-Christian