1977LesPaul

The man made global warming scam is a great example of “men of science” coming together to lie about the truth, suppressing facts, and building up other things to make it look like something is a certain way.

The problem there is the deceitfulness of the heart of man. All of the atheists KNOW God exists, but they lie about it, they lie to themselves, they bring charges against a God they claim doesn’t exist, and they rant and rave, because that is part of their active suppression, and anger at God. See, if God existed, then He would have some say over them, how they live, their guilt or innocence. The very thought of that enrages them to no end. The closer the truth of God is brought to them, the more they will rail in hate against Him.

That’s the problem though, it’s all they can do, because they are slaves to certain desires they have, they can’t turn, they can’t be healed apart from Him. So, my question is, how do we treat them? Do we play their game and give them evidence that they will always reject?

Ok, so we now know that modern scientists who were telling us all about the manmade global warming were suppressing some data, and building up other data to support an agenda.

So, could scientists (most of which are atheists) that tell us all that mankind is the product of evolution be lying as well? I mean the evolutionary chart is pretty much just a bunch of pictures. They don’t have a whole lot of bones.. They have like one jawbone of what looks like an ape, and they have one skull that looks like a guy that I used to go to high school with… Other than that, it’s all just imaginary pictures…

Anyway, is there any way that some of this could be the same kind of “agenda science” that we saw in the global warming scam?

Please only respnd if you are an honest person with an open mind. No close minded evolutionary zealots.

Until scientists who study the theory of evolution (and by this I mean macro) have been able to observe everything, how can we be sure they correctly understand the things that they claim to know? There is really no way to be certain about it.

Or are all of their beliefs built on shallow concepts, lies, and demonization of any who do not agree with the liberal agenda?

Despite spending trillions, team Obama policies has minorities way more unemployed than whites. Do you think he divides on purpose? A people in crisis will accept radical policy changes in the hope that they will fix the problem…

We have an administration that has us in double digit unemployment, in debt up to our ears, weakened our defenses, made enemies of our allies, turned a deaf ear to the will of the people, and divided our nation like never before. Everyone admits that November elections will be a moratorium on the liberal ideals that have brought us to this point, but since there are so many people in our nation who are uninformed, have entitlement mentalities, and don’t understand why things are happening, or the significance of them, will there be enough people to bring the changes we need, or to roll back the damage done?

Is Obama’s harsh treatment of our only ally in the Middle East his way of building credibility with the Islamic nations?

If the nation of Israel changes it’s name to Iran, will it get better treatment from the Obama Administration?

Has anyone heard of any death threats they actually have on audio or video? Is the n-word or f-word on audio or video from when they provocatively marched through protestors?

Is the real death threat from the ObamaCare legislation? Death to our economy, Death to the greatest healthcare system in the world? Could it be that we are the real victims here of congress rather than them trying to pretend like they are the victims?

I have a 2 wheel drive, manual transmission 1997 Ford Ranger pickup. I got the clutch replaced about 3 or 4 years ago with a heavy duty clutch. Lately, I have been having to push the peddle almost to the floor to get the clutch to disengage, and when that happens at a stop, it’s hard to shift into first. There is plenty of fluid in the reservoir. I bled the clutch on two occasions recently, and each time it seemed better, almost back to normal. In fact, it will act normal, but occasionally it will act up bad again, need the peddle pushed almost all the way to the floor, and be hard to shift into gear, but then it will get better again… Any ideas?

First off, the federal government doesn't tell people to buy auto insurance, that is the States that do that. Under the constitution, the Federal government doesn’t have a right to force Americans to buy anything.

Second, imagine a world where people didn’t have to buy car insurance until they got into a wreck. That is exactly what this healthcare plan is. People just have to pay a small fine for not having insurance that is much less than an insurance policy would cost, then when they get into a wreck, then, this bill forces insurance companies to insure these people…

Now, I ask you, how long with the insurance companies be able to afford that? Not long. They will soon be out of business, leaving only one provider standing… The Federal Government!

Since God grants mankind these fundamental rights, they cannot be taken away by man. So is heathcare a 4th right? Do we need to add that to our Declaration as something God grants us?

Is it that we are making a new America with new rights, and instead of it being a privilege, healthcare is a right granted by man? So, is this the only new right? What about the right to a house? To a car to get to work? What about the right to have someone take care of your kids while you work? What about the right to food? Where does it end? How much money is there to redistribute?

My daughter has a 2001 Chevy Prism, which is essentially a rebadged Toyota Corolla.

There is a sensor on the dashboard that automatically turns on the headlights when it gets dark. This does not work. All that happens is the blue high beam light comes on, on the dashboard, but the headlights never come on. However, you can just turn on the headlights manually. That works great, but I’d like for the auto headlights to work. Any ideas? Thanks!

It seems to me that we have been programmed to believe that America continually needs more laws and perpetual changes. It kind of reminds me of someone who continually tweaks their computer, or their stock holdings. Do we really need continual change at the federal level, or would it be so bad if Washington just did less, and left Americans alone to live our lives?

I have owned a 2001 Toyota Sienna minivan for several years now, and we have sometimes had a vibration felt strongly in the steering wheel. It’s a problem that often occurs at the worst time – When we are on a long trip! The tires are good and balanced, and have been replaced, and balanced several times without really changing the problem. The struts/shocks have been replaced. There is no noise associated with the vibration, nor is there ever any strange noises. The vibration happens intermittently. I have a theory that it’s related to the rear brakes, because once when we had to have the rear rotors replaced, we noticed the vibrations were worse than ever. The mechanic said that the new rotors had been very hot, and that he adjusted the rear brakes out some, and the problem went away. That makes me think that they are auto adjusting to be too tight, or that could be just a wild goose chase. It could be bearings… When I pull over after vibration the front wheels are often very hot, but I don’t know if that’s normal. I’d like to take a vacation this summer, but relying on the Sienna scares me. Other than that problem, it’s been a great car. Any ideas?

Did Obama show the kind of leadership he should have, or was it full of blame shifting and a lecture? What are your thoughts?

What is the logic behind people thinking that Republicans make oil expensive? Especially at an election time where they would get blamed and booted from office for it?

Basically you are trying to apply empiricism to know if there is a God or not. Empiricism is simply observation of particulars. You want “evidence” or “proof”

First off, how is it reasonable or logical for you to rely on your own reason and observations to know if there is a God? Unless you are able to go all places in and outside of the universe at all times looking for God, then there is no way of knowing if there is or is not a God. Empiricism (which was developed by a Christian thinker named Francis Bacon, not an Atheist) was never meant to be applied to universal things. Only particular and observable things. So, if you fancy yourself a reasonable and logical person, why do you go around asking such unreasonable things such as proof of God? Isn’t that just you saying that your own private and autonomous reason is the ultimate arbiter of truth?

John 6:65 He went on to say, "This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless the Father has enabled him."